Submit a preprint


Interaction of drought and frost in tree ecophysiology: rethinking the timing of risksuse asterix (*) to get italics
Guillaume Charrier, Nicolas Martin-Stpaul, Claire Damesin, Nicolas Delpierre, Heikki Hänninen, José Torres-Ruiz, Hendrik DaviPlease use the format "First name initials family name" as in "Marie S. Curie, Niels H. D. Bohr, Albert Einstein, John R. R. Tolkien, Donna T. Strickland"
In temperate, boreal and alpine areas, the edges of plant distribution are strongly affected by abiotic constraints. For example, heat waves and drought are major constraints at low latitude and elevation while cold and frost are key factors at high latitude and elevation. Over the next few decades, climate variability is expected to increase, enhancing the probability of extreme events and thus the potential stress imposed by abiotic constraints. Moreover, the likelihood of co-occurring and successive constraints, such as drought and frost, could increase in parallel. It is likely that initial exposure to a first constraint would affect the vulnerability to a subsequent one. Three integrative physiological processes, namely water status, carbon status and the timing of phenological stages, are crucial to understanding how trees will respond to these stress factors. Although these processes have largely been studied alone, in response to a single constraint, their interaction has rarely been investigated. In this paper, we have examined how water and carbon status interact with the growth cycle and affect both the vulnerability and the exposure to climatic constraints via two different focuses: (i) How would the interaction of frost and drought constraints modulate the vulnerability to a subsequent constraint? (ii) How vulnerability to a given constraint and phenology interact? In the light of numerous papers, we suggest that the interaction between frost and drought constraints should in the short-term influence water status and, in the longer term, the carbon status, both consequently affecting further vulnerability, potentially leading to a decline. This vulnerability can also be modulated by a shift in the annual phenological cycle induced by a previous constraint. Furthermore, we have identified significant gaps of knowledge in the ecophysiological tree response to interacting stresses based on three major points: (i) the spatio-temporal variation in carbohydrate composition, fluxes and allocation in relation to environmental drivers, (ii) the spatio- temporal variation in water content, water and osmotic potentials, (iii) the modulation of phenological processes in response to stress. This framework can help to improve the current process based models and to identify interactions that needs to be better described in order to obtain a more quantitative and dynamic view of drought and frost vulnerabilities integrating the life history of the individual plant.
You should fill this box only if you chose 'All or part of the results presented in this preprint are based on data'. URL must start with http:// or https://
You should fill this box only if you chose 'Scripts were used to obtain or analyze the results'. URL must start with http:// or https://
You should fill this box only if you chose 'Codes have been used in this study'. URL must start with http:// or https://
Abiotic stress, Acclimation, Carbon availability, Drought, Frost, Phenology, Risk assessment, Tree ecophysiology, Water balance
NonePlease indicate the methods that may require specialised expertise during the peer review process (use a comma to separate various required expertises).
Tree biology and physiology
No need for them to be recommenders of PCI Forest Wood Sci. Please do not suggest reviewers for whom there might be a conflict of interest. Reviewers are not allowed to review preprints written by close colleagues (with whom they have published in the last four years, with whom they have received joint funding in the last four years, or with whom they are currently writing a manuscript, or submitting a grant proposal), or by family members, friends, or anyone for whom bias might affect the nature of the review - see the code of conduct
e.g. John Doe []
2020-04-28 21:07:27
Rosana López